And what about the occasional eaters? Pingback: Fat Tax: A Good Idea or Not? Health organizations and lawmakers across the country have sought to target junk food and curb obesity by taxing sweets, soft drinks and other unhealthy foods. Yes, i think that extra taxes could benefit the cause of slowing the growth of fast food, at the same time creating an opportunity to promote healthy food, and that would help in reducing its price tags. Created: New to Old Created: Old to New Likes: Most to Least Likes: Least to Most Replies: Most to Least Replies: Least to Most Yes The federal government needs to stop paying attention to all the food lobbyists and do what is right for the American people. The federal government needs to stop paying attention to all the food lobbyists and do what is right for the American people.




The federal government needs to stop paying attention to all the food lobbyists and do what is right for the American people. Cheap fast food and many unhealthy foods that contain unhealthy products are subsidized by the gov't. The government needs to make healthy fruits and vegetables cheaper so that the average American can afford to spend their money purchasing real food instead of food that will ultimately lead them to obesity and a life on medication.

I think that Americans eat a lot of fast food and unhealthy food because it is so cheap and convenient. If it were more expensive, they would probably eat out less and cook healthier meals at home. This would definitely reduce obesity issues. So it's a good idea to impose a high tax on such foods. As the old saying goes, "Money Talks. Losing weight because someone wants to be healthier and have a healthier lifestyle is not much of a motivator in this day in age where over-excess and greed is almost a staple in our society.

I think that the tax dollars gleaned from an "unhealthy food tax" should go towards paying for health care. It is useless for fast food and "junk food" companies to claim that they do not target children in their advertising. Children learn their eating habits early in life. Making fast food and junk food less appealing to parents by adding a tax on to the prices would be a step towards forcing them to think tax on options junk food debate what they are teaching their children about the value of food.

It is tax on options junk food debate very sad that we devalue any food in this country enough that we call it "junk. Raise the price of unhealthy foods. Tax on options junk food debate money from the tax can go to the farmers to pay for the healthy food that has been lowered. This evens out the price so farmers will get their fair share. People will realise that the healthier food is cheaper and hopefully realise it is better for them. It is not only obesity we must look out for.

Fast food could be thought of as an apple, a banana, anything The question is WHY do you think of fast food as the leading option for low income meals? How are companies allowed to supply what they do? Not only should these foods pay more, they should be required to offset the negative impacts by supplying non gmo, affordable options by law.

Secondly, the Farm Bill incentives to commodity farmers over small scale fruit and vegetable farmers ought to be reconsidered. There's much more to my argument, but I'll save it for further conversation. The people is going to buy what it is cheap. Why do people buy pizza, ice cream or sandwich? Because it is cheaper and they can buy more and more of that products! Taxes being raised on fast food is a policy which should be implemented immediately.

Currently, it is no longer economic to live on greens and healthy tax on options junk food debate, but one can easily be sustained on junk due to the cheap prices paid for them. In fact, it may even seem today, that taxes are put in a store duty free. Healthy foods should be made more affordable while increasing fast food price rates. Yes, i think that extra taxes could benefit the cause of slowing the growth of fast food, at the same time creating an opportunity to promote healthy food, and that would help in reducing its price tags.

Additionally, it would reduce the amount of money spent to counter the effects of several diseases associated with consuming fast food meal. The only lose that could happen is job loses and that is very easy to tackle. Persuade them to go healthy!! A few people on the opposing tax on options junk food debate are pointing out that it wouldn't be fair to them because they are already skinny and the food doesn't effect their appearance.

What they are failing to recognize is that even though it's not adding on actual weight to their bodies, it slowly damaging their internal organs slowly. It slowly adds fat to your heart. Kudos for having a fast metabolism. Taxing fast food is one thing that should be in affect, another is lowing the prices of healthy foods and regular groceries.

People being better educated about how important home cooked meals actually are would be beneficial. I understand it is a obvious right that we should be able to eat whatever we please. But the corporations and industries alone should also not be processing such harmful and toxic food, then advertise them to us in such a manipulating way. We have been slowly fed the idea that fast food "isn't that bad".

Of course there are other ways to go about winging people off fast foods, but taxing it is just one way that could possibly be beneficial. And, either way the government is taking taxes from us either way. I'm doing a debate on this exact topic, and I'm metatrader resistance support indicator 70909 the negative side, which means I am obviously against this decision, although I do think that this is a fairly complicated topic.

Firstly, our freedom of choice as the public is being taken away. It is up to ourselves to decide, basically up to the decision as an individual of society. Obesity and being overweight is indeed part of genetics, and others may not be able to control themselves with junk food compared to others. I don't know about over there in America, but I live in Australia, and whenever we pay for ANYTHING, we have this thing called GST.

So if we do go with this thing, it's really unfair because we kind of are already paying for tax for junk food, and I completely find this unreasonable. We will then be paying DOUBLE tax for junk food of all things. Anyone else think this is stupid? Not only this, but I strongly believe that the prevention of obesity can be tackled in other, more reasonable options. Don't ask what, because I'm still coming up with some and it's my first time debating.

Maybe more constant advertisement campaigns which are kind of 'scaring' the obese into getting fit. I know this sounds mean, but again here in Australia, we have some pretty major commercials on smoking, drink driving and not putting your seat-belt on. And I must admit it is VERY scary. They will explain how in very clear detail how you can die, or trying to kill yourself. Same thing with eating basically.

How fair is that for people like me who eat junk regularly and are naturally skinny? Not everyone becomes obese because of junk food. I have friends who eat quite a lot of junk everyday just like me and are stick thin. I've seen pudgy people eating only "healthy" foods. The food Nazis better calm the heck down Gosh I'm scared for this country.

Are you serious, people? Yes, okay, it may help, but you can't predict this. The higher the price the fewer buyers will be, and more money will be wasted on stupid government! How do you know that the extra money tax will be put to good use? Governments say, "We will have the tax tax on options junk food debate help in creating more roads and houses. Will this tax make obese people stay away from these stores? It's a little tax.

The question is, will it do anything? I don't think so. But if it does, this may make buyers and customers say, 'No more junk food, it's just too expensive. People could lose jobs or not earn as much money as they did before this stupid tax. So let's leave it to you to make your own decisions! Just because junk food is bad for people who suffer obesity, shouldn't mean that everyone who enjoys the quick, cheap service fast food offers. People who are always in a hurry, or people short on cash may find fast food an ideal service, but if it is taxed due to obesity, then it will also affect people who aren't obese.

People choose to eat fast food, nobody's holding a gun to their heads and saying, you have to eat this every day. And what about the occasional eaters? Who only eat fast tax on options junk food debate once in a blue moon as an occasional treat? Being a thin teenager myself, I have a lot of friends who eat junk food and are still really thin too. No, putting a higher tax on fast foods and other unhealthy foods would not help the country-wide obesity issues.

The problem with putting a tax on fast food items is that there is too much to take into account, such as the amount of calories in the rest of the diet, how often fast food is consumed and how frequently they eat this type of food. Plus, putting a high tax rate on fast food items would not only take part in hurting the economy, it would only affect the light eaters.

This tax will most likely not affect the people who already eat fast food too often and are overweight. They already realize that this food is not good for them. The junk food tax is really just a tax on the poor. They walk in and see that they could afford a cheeseburger. They now have 2 options. They could: A Starve because they can no longer afford food prices, or B they can steal, which will land them in jail. Neither of these are beneficial, so neither is the tax.

The homeless rate within Australia is through the roof, yet here we are arguing over junk food. Why would you charge more for bad foods when you could lower the price of healthy foods to make them way more appealing. Add a New Topic. Would imposing a high tax on fast foods and other unhealthy foods help combat obesity issues in the U. Add a New Topic Add to My Favorites. Report This Topic Would imposing a high tax on fast foods and other unhealthy foods help combat obesity issues in the U.

Created: New to Old Created: Old to New Likes: Most to Least Likes: Least to Most Replies: Most to Least Replies: Least to Most Yes The federal government needs to stop paying attention to all the food lobbyists and do what is right for the American people. Assasinator abdulmueedqurashi athh00 BIGMAN Maximum words Posted by: TigerDeII. Assasinator abdulmueedqurashi BIGMAN Maximum words Posted by: BrianDj.

Assasinator abdulmueedqurashi BIGMAN Maximum words Posted by: Shim2free. Assasinator abdulmueedqurashi BIGMAN Maximum words. Reply Maximum words. Reply Maximum words I think the people saying yes only see the side of because people are obese. Reply Maximum words Posted by: Ch4ddMc. Related Opinions Do you believe it is justifiable to lose ten years of life expectancy to become extremely attractive or famous? Is the government to blame for obesity?

Is obesity the government's business? Is child obesity getting out of control? Does technology impact childhood obesity? Do you think fast food companies are responsible for the growing problem of obesity in America Should the American Medical Association Have Classified Obesity as a Disease? Has modern education lead to juvenile diabetes and obesity?

Has modern education led to juvenile obesity and diabetes? Should there be legislations that protect the obese? Comments 2 Maximum words Anonymous says T Report Post Anonymous says T I'm doing a debate about putting a tax on junk food, and my team and I are on the negative side so we're obviously against this decision, and that there should not be a tax. My part of the debate is that: Obesity is a Complex Problem.

In other words, there should, and are many other ways to tackle this problem, by not of course adding a tax to junk food. I'm a bit stuck on what points and other solutions can be made for this problem. I mean like, not things like TV shows for losing weight, health and weight loss programs, because in my opinion, only a few obese people will be motivated, but some are still lazy, and will find it difficult just getting off the living room couch.

But, I mean something that hasn't been already thought about, that you think may actually work. Please don't think that I'm lazy because I can't think of my own options, it's my first time debating and I AM STUCK! But please help, it would really help out. Thanks :D Also I am Australian, not American, but there really is no difference, seeing that we are both the leading countries of obesity in the world. Privacy Policy Terms of Use Sitemap View Desktop Version.




Debate: Junkfood Doesn't Badly Affect Health


Beginning April 1, the Nation will become the first place in the United States to impose a tax on junk food. Subscribe to Civil Eats ; Top. The government should implement a special " junk of proof in this debate. I propose that the junk food tax other healthy dining options would be exempted. Video embedded  · So why on earth has their government become the first in the world to introduce a tax on junk food? demanding healthier options. debate on the.